What Counts as a “Favorable Termination” in Bronx Cases?
What This Legal Standard Means for Bronx Civil Rights Lawsuits
If your criminal charges in New York were dropped, dismissed, or resolved in your favor, you may be wondering if you can take legal action against the people who put you through it.
Before that can happen, the law requires something specific: a "favorable termination." It means your case ended in a way that legally clears you. Not partially, not with conditions, but fully, in your favor. This standard plays a huge role in civil rights cases under Section 1983, especially for malicious prosecution claims.
At Horn Wright, LLP, we represent individuals in the Bronx and across New York who want to hold law enforcement accountable after wrongful arrests and prosecutions. If your case was dismissed or ended with no conviction, our Bronx civil rights attorneys can explain what your outcome means and whether it opens the door to filing a lawsuit.
We can guide you through the steps to pursue justice and protect your future.

Know Why Favorable Termination Matters in Civil Rights Claims
To sue for false arrest or malicious prosecution under Section 1983, the first question courts ask is: how did the criminal case end? If the answer shows the case ended in your favor, that’s the first box checked. Without it, the lawsuit usually fails before it starts.
This requirement exists because courts want finality. They don’t want civil lawsuits interfering with unresolved criminal matters. A favorable termination confirms the criminal process has finished and that you’re no longer under the cloud of prosecution.
It also protects the fairness of your civil claim. If a criminal case ends with a conviction or a plea, the law views that as an admission, not as evidence of wrongdoing by the police or prosecutors.
In short, favorable termination is the legal green light. Without it, even strong stories of injustice can’t move forward in court.
Identify the Outcomes New York Courts Recognize as Favorable
Several types of case outcomes count as favorable terminations in New York. These are the ones that signal the case ended in your favor, with no finding of guilt and no future risk of prosecution for the same charges.
They include:
- Acquittal at trial, whether by jury or judge
- Dismissal in the interest of justice under CPL §170.40
- Dismissal for lack of evidence or procedural error
- Grand jury refusal to indict (no true bill)
- Prosecutor’s formal declination to prosecute
All of these show the criminal system either couldn’t prove the case or chose not to move forward. That makes them valid for filing a Section 1983 claim.
In the Bronx, many dismissals happen before trial. For example, the Bronx District Attorney’s Office might drop misdemeanor charges after reviewing footage or witness interviews. If that happens with no conditions and no plea, it often qualifies as a favorable termination.
If you’re unsure how your case ended, you can request a Certificate of Disposition from Bronx Criminal Court. This document provides the official record of your case outcome.
Understand the Impact of Conditional Dismissals
Some dismissals seem favorable but come with strings attached. These are more complicated. When a case is dismissed after you agree to certain conditions, courts sometimes view it as a compromise, not a clean break.
Common examples:
- Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD): The case gets dismissed if you avoid new charges for six months
- Dismissal after community service or program participation: Courts may treat this as a negotiated resolution
- Deferred prosecutions: Prosecutors pause the case, then dismiss it later if you meet conditions
In these cases, the court might not see the dismissal as a clear statement that the charges were unfounded. Instead, it may suggest you agreed to some accountability in exchange for having the case closed.
Some judges will still treat these outcomes as favorable. Others will not. It often depends on how the paperwork is written, which is why it’s important to have a civil rights attorney review your file.
Recognize Why Plea Deals Disqualify You From Filing
Plea deals make it very hard, if not impossible, to file a civil rights claim. Even if you pled to a non-criminal offense or violation, the court sees that as an admission of wrongdoing.
Examples of plea outcomes that usually block Section 1983 lawsuits:
- Guilty plea to a lesser charge like disorderly conduct
- Conditional discharge in exchange for a plea
- Plea to a non-criminal violation to avoid trial
In each of these, the record reflects that you accepted responsibility. Courts typically rule that such cases cannot form the basis of a malicious prosecution or false arrest claim.
If you’re facing charges now and thinking about a plea, speak to an attorney first. A quick deal to end a case can close off your rights to sue for what happened.
Check Your Disposition Paperwork for Key Language
The strongest way to confirm your outcome is to look at your court records. Don’t rely on what you remember or what someone told you in court. Get the paperwork.
Look for terms such as:
- “Dismissed in the interest of justice”
- “Acquitted”
- “Dismissed with prejudice”
- “Declined to prosecute”
These phrases show the court or the DA fully closed the case and cannot bring it again. That’s what makes them valuable in civil litigation.
On the other hand, outcomes labeled “dismissed without prejudice” or “ACD” can be trickier. They might still leave open the chance of the charges being refiled or may reflect a neutral outcome.
Consider the Role of the Prosecutor’s Reasoning
When a DA drops a case, the reason behind that decision matters. If the DA clearly states there was not enough evidence or that the prosecution no longer serves justice, that can support your claim.
However, not all dismissals are that clear. Some are silent. Others happen because a witness fails to appear or because the court is overloaded with cases. In those situations, judges may view the outcome as procedural, not substantive.
If your prosecutor made a statement on the record, ask your criminal defense attorney if it was transcribed. Written records from court proceedings can help civil rights lawyers prove that your case ended favorably.
It’s also a good idea to collect any documents the DA’s office gave you when the case ended. Even a brief note stating the case won’t proceed can help build your civil claim.
Apply the U.S. Supreme Court’s Thompson v. Clark Ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court changed the rules in 2022. In Thompson v. Clark, the Court ruled that plaintiffs do not need to prove they were innocent, only that their case ended without a conviction.
This decision made it easier to bring civil rights claims. Before Thompson, some courts required you to show the dismissal implied your innocence. Now, you just have to show the case closed in your favor.
This ruling applies across New York and includes Bronx cases. So if your case was dropped, declined, or dismissed, you may meet the standard for favorable termination even if no one declared you innocent.
Talk to a Lawyer Before Accepting a Case Resolution
If your criminal case is still active, now is the time to speak with a civil rights lawyer. Some resolutions that seem helpful may hurt your future options.
A civil rights attorney can:
- Review your plea options before you agree to anything
- Help your defense attorney negotiate a dismissal that meets the standard
- Flag outcomes that will block your ability to sue later
- Coordinate documentation to support your civil case later
In Bronx courts, where plea deals are common and court calendars are crowded, people often accept outcomes that end the case quickly. But quick resolutions don’t always protect your rights.
Apply the Standard to Your Case in the Bronx
You can evaluate your own case by asking a few key questions:
- Was the case dismissed, dropped, or did it end in an acquittal?
- Did you accept a plea of any kind?
- Did you complete a program or make any agreement before the dismissal?
- What does your Certificate of Disposition actually say?
If your answer points to a full dismissal, an acquittal, or a formal decision not to prosecute, you may meet the favorable termination requirement. That means you could take legal action against those responsible for your prosecution or arrest.
Bronx Criminal Court can be complex. Language matters. So does timing. If you’re unsure, a civil rights lawyer can help you break down your records and make an informed decision.
Find Out If You Can Take the Next Step
If your Bronx criminal case ended in your favor, that may be the first step toward holding police or prosecutors accountable.
The favorable termination standard is what allows you to move forward. But your success depends on the paperwork, the timing, and the language the court used.
At Horn Wright, LLP, we help clients across New York figure out whether their case qualifies under Section 1983. Contact us to review your outcome, protect your rights, and explore what’s possible.
What Sets Us Apart From The Rest?
Horn Wright, LLP is here to help you get the results you need with a team you can trust.
-
Client-Focused ApproachWe’re a client-centered, results-oriented firm. When you work with us, you can have confidence we’ll put your best interests at the forefront of your case – it’s that simple.
-
Creative & Innovative Solutions
No two cases are the same, and neither are their solutions. Our attorneys provide creative points of view to yield exemplary results.
-
Experienced Attorneys
We have a team of trusted and respected attorneys to ensure your case is matched with the best attorney possible.
-
Driven By Justice
The core of our legal practice is our commitment to obtaining justice for those who have been wronged and need a powerful voice.