
Historical Context and Legal Evolution of Racial Profiling
Why Looking Back Helps You Understand Today
When you’ve been profiled, it feels raw and personal. But it’s not just you. What happened comes from decades of history baked into our systems. Racial profiling didn’t appear out of thin air. It’s been around for generations, shifting shape but never fully going away.
In New York and across the country, people of color have always carried this weight. From old-school patrols to modern stop-and-frisk, the story is the same. Folks getting singled out for how they look, not what they did.
Knowing the history doesn’t make the sting easier, but it shows you’re not imagining things. You’re part of a bigger story that the law is still trying to fix. At Horn Wright, LLP, our racial profiling attorneys use this history to your advantage.
We show courts that profiling is systemic. And when you reach out to us at (855) 465-4622, we’ll talk through your experience, then connect it to the long fight that’s been unfolding for decades.
Early Roots of Profiling in America
Profiling’s roots stretch back further than most people think.
In the South, slave patrols were created to stop and question Black people simply for being outside. After slavery ended, Jim Crow laws carried that same suspicion into daily life. Law enforcement was used to control, not protect.
In New York, immigrant groups also felt the sting in the early 20th century. Italians, Irish, and Jewish immigrants were watched, harassed, and denied housing or jobs because of stereotypes. It was profiling, just under a different name.
That history explains why today’s communities often don’t trust law enforcement. It’s not just one bad stop. It’s generations of unfair treatment stacked up, leaving scars that don’t fade quickly.
Landmark Moments That Shifted the Law
Over time, communities fought back and slowly, the law started catching up. A few major milestones gave people real tools to challenge profiling.
- Civil Rights Act of 1964. This landmark law banned discrimination in housing, jobs, and public spaces. It was the first time federal law gave people nationwide protection against profiling.
- Fair Housing Act of 1968. Passed just after Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, this law tackled discrimination in housing. Redlining, steering, and rental bias were outlawed, though in practice, many communities still struggled to enforce it.
- 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. This statute lets you sue state officials for civil rights violations. It became a powerful way for victims of police profiling to hold departments accountable in federal court.
- NYSHRL & NYC Human Rights Law. New York added its own protections. The state law bars discrimination in jobs, housing, and public spaces, while the city law goes even further, giving New Yorkers some of the broadest civil rights protections in the country.
The War on Drugs and Its Legacy
The 1980s and 90s poured gasoline on the fire. The “War on Drugs” turned entire neighborhoods into police zones. Officers were told to be aggressive, and the results were predictable—Black and Latino communities were targeted hardest.
That’s where the phrase “driving while Black” came from. People of color were pulled over, searched, and arrested without cause. And in New York, stop-and-frisk became a daily fear for thousands of young men of color.
Courts later called these practices unconstitutional, but the damage was done. Families were torn apart. Trust in police tanked. And even today, data shows people of color in New York are still stopped and searched at higher rates than white residents.
Major Cases That Changed the Conversation
Profiling didn’t just change because of public outrage. It changed because people went to court and demanded accountability.
- Floyd v. City of New York (2013). A federal judge ruled NYPD’s stop-and-frisk program unconstitutional. The decision forced reforms and proved profiling was real, not just anecdotal.
- Brown v. City of Oneonta (1999). After a crime, police targeted nearly every Black man in town. The sweeping dragnet showed how dangerous profiling can be when race is the only factor.
- Daniels v. City of New York (2003). Filed before Floyd, this case challenged stop-and-frisk too. The settlement demanded more oversight and tracking, laying the groundwork for later reforms.
- Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman (1982). In housing, this Supreme Court case confirmed that tenants lied to about availability because of race could sue. It validated the use of “testers” to prove discrimination.
How Laws Expanded in New York
New York went further than most states in tackling profiling. The NYSHRL (N.Y. Exec. Law Section 296) bans racial discrimination in jobs, housing, and public accommodations. The NYC Human Rights Law (NYC Admin. Code Section 8-107) stretches even further—so broad that many experts call it the most protective civil rights law in the country.
What does that mean for you? It means you don’t need a smoking gun. Courts will look at patterns, data, and even subtle evidence to decide whether profiling happened. That makes it easier for victims to come forward and win.
Other states where our civil rights lawyers practice—Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and New Jersey—have their own protections. New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD) is especially strong. But New York remains one of the most favorable states to fight profiling.
Ongoing Challenges You Still See Today
Even with decades of progress, profiling isn’t gone. Black and Latino New Yorkers are still stopped, searched, suspended, or denied housing at higher rates. Communities still report unequal treatment, even when laws clearly forbid it.
Now, there’s a new twist: technology. Algorithms used in hiring or predictive policing often copy old biases. Instead of fixing profiling, they automate it. That’s the new frontier, and courts are just starting to wrestle with how to handle it.
That’s why vigilance matters. Laws only matter if they’re enforced. It takes individuals, communities, and lawyers pressing forward to make sure the protections on paper turn into real change in daily life.
Why Legal Help Matters in This Fight
History gives you context, but lawyers give you leverage. If you’ve been profiled, your experience isn’t just a one-off—it connects to decades of unfair treatment that courts already recognize. A skilled legal team ties your case to that history, making your story harder to dismiss.
Our racial profiling lawyers at Horn Wright, LLP, lean on this history in every case. We pull precedents, highlight patterns, and show that your experience is part of something bigger. That makes judges and juries pay attention.
Our recognition as one of the most trusted law firms in the country reflects our commitment to seeing justice through. If you’ve been profiled, don’t carry the weight by yourself. We’re here to fight alongside you.

What Sets Us Apart From The Rest?
Horn Wright, LLP is here to help you get the results you need with a team you can trust.
-
We’re a client-centered, results-oriented firm. When you work with us, you can have confidence we’ll put your best interests at the forefront of your case – it’s that simple.
-
No two cases are the same, and neither are their solutions. Our attorneys provide creative points of view to yield exemplary results.
-
We have a team of trusted and respected attorneys to ensure your case is matched with the best attorney possible.
-
The core of our legal practice is our commitment to obtaining justice for those who have been wronged and need a powerful voice.